3.35 vs Europe
How do the 3.35 and Europe compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
3.35 .svg?width=960)
Europe | 3.35 | Europe | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 11.0 ft3.35 m | 11.0 ft3.35 m |
| Waterline length | —— | —— |
| Beam | 2.1 ft0.65 m | 4.7 ft1.44 m |
| Draft | —— | 0.5 ft0.15 m |
| Displacement | 35 lb16 kg | 99 lb45 kg |
| Ballast | —— | —— |
| Sail area | —— | —— |
| SA / Displacement | — | — |
| Displacement / Length | — | — |
| Comfort ratio | — | — |
| Capsize screening | 2.60 | 4.08 |
| Hull speed (kn) | — | — |
3.35 vs Europe: the short version
- The 3.35 and Europe are close in length (11.0 ft3.35 m vs 11.0 ft3.35 m ).
- The Europe is heavier, displacing about 183% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- By the capsize screening formula the 3.35 rates better for offshore work (2.60 vs 4.08).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.