3.35 vs Skunk 11
How do the 3.35 and Skunk 11 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
3.35 | 3.35 | Skunk 11 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 11.0 ft3.35 m | 11.1 ft3.38 m |
| Waterline length | —— | 9.5 ft2.90 m |
| Beam | 2.1 ft0.65 m | 5.4 ft1.65 m |
| Draft | —— | 2.5 ft0.76 m |
| Displacement | 35 lb16 kg | 190 lb86 kg |
| Ballast | —— | —— |
| Sail area | —— | 70 ft²6.5 m² |
| SA / Displacement | — | 33.89 |
| Displacement / Length | — | 99 |
| Comfort ratio | — | 3.1 |
| Capsize screening | 2.60 | 3.77 |
| Hull speed (kn) | — | 4.1 |
3.35 vs Skunk 11: the short version
- The 3.35 and Skunk 11 are close in length (11.0 ft3.35 m vs 11.1 ft3.38 m ).
- The Skunk 11 is heavier, displacing about 443% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- By the capsize screening formula the 3.35 rates better for offshore work (2.60 vs 3.77).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.