49er vs Com-pac 16
How do the 49er and Com-pac 16 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
49er 
Com-pac 16 | 49er | Com-pac 16 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 16.0 ft4.88 m | 16.0 ft4.88 m |
| Waterline length | —— | 14.0 ft4.27 m |
| Beam | 9.0 ft2.74 m | 6.0 ft1.83 m |
| Draft | 4.8 ft1.45 m | 1.5 ft0.46 m |
| Displacement | 207 lb94 kg | 1,100 lb499 kg |
| Ballast | —— | 450 lb204 kg |
| Sail area | —— | 120 ft²11.1 m² |
| SA / Displacement | — | 18.02 |
| Displacement / Length | — | 179 |
| Comfort ratio | — | 10.7 |
| Capsize screening | 6.09 | 2.32 |
| Hull speed (kn) | — | 5.0 |
49er vs Com-pac 16: the short version
- The 49er and Com-pac 16 are close in length (16.0 ft4.88 m vs 16.0 ft4.88 m ).
- The Com-pac 16 is heavier, displacing about 431% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- By the capsize screening formula the Com-pac 16 rates better for offshore work (2.32 vs 6.09).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.