49er vs Laguna 16
How do the 49er and Laguna 16 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
49er 
Laguna 16 | 49er | Laguna 16 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 16.0 ft4.88 m | 16.0 ft4.88 m |
| Waterline length | —— | 14.7 ft4.47 m |
| Beam | 9.0 ft2.74 m | 7.4 ft2.26 m |
| Draft | 4.8 ft1.45 m | 2.4 ft0.74 m |
| Displacement | 207 lb94 kg | 1,000 lb454 kg |
| Ballast | —— | 400 lb181 kg |
| Sail area | —— | 117 ft²10.9 m² |
| SA / Displacement | — | 18.72 |
| Displacement / Length | — | 141 |
| Comfort ratio | — | 7.1 |
| Capsize screening | 6.09 | 2.97 |
| Hull speed (kn) | — | 5.1 |
49er vs Laguna 16: the short version
- The 49er and Laguna 16 are close in length (16.0 ft4.88 m vs 16.0 ft4.88 m ).
- The Laguna 16 is heavier, displacing about 383% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- By the capsize screening formula the Laguna 16 rates better for offshore work (2.97 vs 6.09).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.