49er vs Martin 16
How do the 49er and Martin 16 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
49er 
Martin 16 | 49er | Martin 16 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 16.0 ft4.88 m | 16.0 ft4.88 m |
| Waterline length | —— | 16.0 ft4.88 m |
| Beam | 9.0 ft2.74 m | 4.3 ft1.32 m |
| Draft | 4.8 ft1.45 m | 3.3 ft1.01 m |
| Displacement | 207 lb94 kg | 730 lb331 kg |
| Ballast | —— | 330 lb150 kg |
| Sail area | —— | 100 ft²9.3 m² |
| SA / Displacement | — | 19.74 |
| Displacement / Length | — | 80 |
| Comfort ratio | — | 10.0 |
| Capsize screening | 6.09 | 1.92 |
| Hull speed (kn) | — | 5.4 |
49er vs Martin 16: the short version
- The 49er and Martin 16 are close in length (16.0 ft4.88 m vs 16.0 ft4.88 m ).
- The Martin 16 is heavier, displacing about 253% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- By the capsize screening formula the Martin 16 rates better for offshore work (1.92 vs 6.09).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.