49er vs Phantom 16
How do the 49er and Phantom 16 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
49er 
Phantom 16 | 49er | Phantom 16 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 16.0 ft4.88 m | 15.9 ft4.85 m |
| Waterline length | —— | —— |
| Beam | 9.0 ft2.74 m | 7.5 ft2.30 m |
| Draft | 4.8 ft1.45 m | 1.5 ft0.46 m |
| Displacement | 207 lb94 kg | 265 lb120 kg |
| Ballast | —— | —— |
| Sail area | —— | 301 ft²28.0 m² |
| SA / Displacement | — | 116.73 |
| Displacement / Length | — | — |
| Comfort ratio | — | — |
| Capsize screening | 6.09 | 4.70 |
| Hull speed (kn) | — | — |
49er vs Phantom 16: the short version
- The 49er and Phantom 16 are close in length (16.0 ft4.88 m vs 15.9 ft4.85 m ).
- The Phantom 16 is heavier, displacing about 28% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- By the capsize screening formula the Phantom 16 rates better for offshore work (4.70 vs 6.09).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.