A-Scow vs Alajuela 38
How do the A-Scow and Alajuela 38 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
A-Scow | A-Scow | Alajuela 38 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 38.0 ft11.58 m | 38.0 ft11.58 m |
| Waterline length | —— | 32.6 ft9.93 m |
| Beam | 8.3 ft2.51 m | 11.5 ft3.51 m |
| Draft | 4.0 ft1.22 m | 6.0 ft1.83 m |
| Displacement | 1,850 lb839 kg | 27,000 lb12,247 kg |
| Ballast | —— | 10,000 lb4,536 kg |
| Sail area | 500 ft²46.5 m² | 837 ft²77.8 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 53.09 | 14.88 |
| Displacement / Length | — | 349 |
| Comfort ratio | — | 47.2 |
| Capsize screening | 2.69 | 1.53 |
| Hull speed (kn) | — | 7.6 |
A-Scow vs Alajuela 38: the short version
- The A-Scow and Alajuela 38 are close in length (38.0 ft11.58 m vs 38.0 ft11.58 m ).
- The Alajuela 38 is heavier, displacing about 1359% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the A-Scow carries the more powerful rig (53.1 vs 14.9), favouring lighter-air performance.
- By the capsize screening formula the Alajuela 38 rates better for offshore work (1.53 vs 2.69).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.