A-Scow vs E-Scow
How do the A-Scow and E-Scow compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
A-Scow | A-Scow | E-Scow | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 38.0 ft11.58 m | 28.0 ft8.53 m |
| Waterline length | —— | —— |
| Beam | 8.3 ft2.51 m | 6.8 ft2.06 m |
| Draft | 4.0 ft1.22 m | 3.8 ft1.14 m |
| Displacement | 1,850 lb839 kg | 965 lb438 kg |
| Ballast | —— | —— |
| Sail area | 500 ft²46.5 m² | 323 ft²30.0 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 53.09 | 52.92 |
| Displacement / Length | — | — |
| Comfort ratio | — | — |
| Capsize screening | 2.69 | 2.73 |
| Hull speed (kn) | — | — |
A-Scow vs E-Scow: the short version
- The A-Scow is the larger boat at 38.0 ft11.58 m LOA versus 28.0 ft8.53 m for the E-Scow.
- The A-Scow is heavier, displacing about 92% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the A-Scow carries the more powerful rig (53.1 vs 52.9), favouring lighter-air performance.
- By the capsize screening formula the A-Scow rates better for offshore work (2.69 vs 2.73).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.