A-Scow vs Yankee 38
How do the A-Scow and Yankee 38 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
A-Scow | A-Scow | Yankee 38 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 38.0 ft11.58 m | 38.2 ft11.63 m |
| Waterline length | —— | 28.8 ft8.76 m |
| Beam | 8.3 ft2.51 m | 11.8 ft3.58 m |
| Draft | 4.0 ft1.22 m | 6.3 ft1.91 m |
| Displacement | 1,850 lb839 kg | 16,000 lb7,257 kg |
| Ballast | —— | 7,327 lb3,323 kg |
| Sail area | 500 ft²46.5 m² | 638 ft²59.3 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 53.09 | 16.08 |
| Displacement / Length | — | 301 |
| Comfort ratio | — | 29.4 |
| Capsize screening | 2.69 | 1.87 |
| Hull speed (kn) | — | 7.2 |
A-Scow vs Yankee 38: the short version
- The A-Scow and Yankee 38 are close in length (38.0 ft11.58 m vs 38.2 ft11.63 m ).
- The Yankee 38 is heavier, displacing about 765% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the A-Scow carries the more powerful rig (53.1 vs 16.1), favouring lighter-air performance.
- By the capsize screening formula the Yankee 38 rates better for offshore work (1.87 vs 2.69).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.