Abbott 33 vs Hunter 33.5
How do the Abbott 33 and Hunter 33.5 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Abbott 33 
Hunter 33.5 | Abbott 33 | Hunter 33.5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 33.3 ft10.15 m | 33.3 ft10.16 m |
| Waterline length | 26.9 ft8.21 m | 26.8 ft8.18 m |
| Beam | 8.2 ft2.50 m | 10.9 ft3.33 m |
| Draft | 5.4 ft1.65 m | 4.5 ft1.37 m |
| Displacement | 6,057 lb2,747 kg | 11,000 lb4,990 kg |
| Ballast | 3,304 lb1,499 kg | 4,500 lb2,041 kg |
| Sail area | 432 ft²40.1 m² | 520 ft²48.3 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 20.80 | 16.82 |
| Displacement / Length | 139 | 254 |
| Comfort ratio | 19.7 | 24.5 |
| Capsize screening | 1.80 | 1.96 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.0 | 6.9 |
Abbott 33 vs Hunter 33.5: the short version
- The Abbott 33 and Hunter 33.5 are close in length (33.3 ft10.15 m vs 33.3 ft10.16 m ).
- The Hunter 33.5 is heavier, displacing about 82% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Abbott 33 carries the more powerful rig (20.8 vs 16.8), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Hunter 33.5 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Abbott 33 rates better for offshore work (1.80 vs 1.96).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.