Abbott 33 vs Nonsuch 33
How do the Abbott 33 and Nonsuch 33 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Abbott 33 
Nonsuch 33 | Abbott 33 | Nonsuch 33 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 33.3 ft10.15 m | 33.4 ft10.19 m |
| Waterline length | 26.9 ft8.21 m | 31.5 ft9.59 m |
| Beam | 8.2 ft2.50 m | 12.5 ft3.81 m |
| Draft | 5.4 ft1.65 m | 5.3 ft1.62 m |
| Displacement | 6,057 lb2,747 kg | 15,350 lb6,963 kg |
| Ballast | 3,304 lb1,499 kg | 6,050 lb2,744 kg |
| Sail area | 432 ft²40.1 m² | 669 ft²62.2 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 20.80 | 17.33 |
| Displacement / Length | 139 | 220 |
| Comfort ratio | 19.7 | 25.6 |
| Capsize screening | 1.80 | 2.01 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.0 | 7.5 |
Abbott 33 vs Nonsuch 33: the short version
- The Abbott 33 and Nonsuch 33 are close in length (33.3 ft10.15 m vs 33.4 ft10.19 m ).
- The Nonsuch 33 is heavier, displacing about 153% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Abbott 33 carries the more powerful rig (20.8 vs 17.3), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Nonsuch 33 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Abbott 33 rates better for offshore work (1.80 vs 2.01).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.