Achilles 24 vs Eastward Ho 24
How do the Achilles 24 and Eastward Ho 24 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Achilles 24 | Achilles 24 | Eastward Ho 24 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 23.8 ft7.24 m | 23.7 ft7.21 m |
| Waterline length | 19.5 ft5.94 m | 20.0 ft6.10 m |
| Beam | 7.1 ft2.16 m | 8.7 ft2.64 m |
| Draft | 3.8 ft1.14 m | 3.8 ft1.17 m |
| Displacement | 2,600 lb1,179 kg | 7,000 lb3,175 kg |
| Ballast | 1,314 lb596 kg | 3,000 lb1,361 kg |
| Sail area | 210 ft²19.5 m² | 301 ft²28.0 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 17.77 | 13.16 |
| Displacement / Length | 157 | 391 |
| Comfort ratio | 14.2 | 28.9 |
| Capsize screening | 2.06 | 1.81 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.9 | 6.0 |
Achilles 24 vs Eastward Ho 24: the short version
- The Achilles 24 and Eastward Ho 24 are close in length (23.8 ft7.24 m vs 23.7 ft7.21 m ).
- The Eastward Ho 24 is heavier, displacing about 169% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Achilles 24 carries the more powerful rig (17.8 vs 13.2), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Eastward Ho 24 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Eastward Ho 24 rates better for offshore work (1.81 vs 2.06).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.