Achilles 24 vs Ranger 23
How do the Achilles 24 and Ranger 23 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Achilles 24 | Achilles 24 | Ranger 23 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 23.8 ft7.24 m | 23.7 ft7.21 m |
| Waterline length | 19.5 ft5.94 m | 20.0 ft6.10 m |
| Beam | 7.1 ft2.16 m | 7.9 ft2.41 m |
| Draft | 3.8 ft1.14 m | 3.8 ft1.14 m |
| Displacement | 2,600 lb1,179 kg | 3,400 lb1,542 kg |
| Ballast | 1,314 lb596 kg | 1,500 lb680 kg |
| Sail area | 210 ft²19.5 m² | 244 ft²22.7 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 17.77 | 17.27 |
| Displacement / Length | 157 | 190 |
| Comfort ratio | 14.2 | 15.8 |
| Capsize screening | 2.06 | 2.11 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.9 | 6.0 |
Achilles 24 vs Ranger 23: the short version
- The Achilles 24 and Ranger 23 are close in length (23.8 ft7.24 m vs 23.7 ft7.21 m ).
- The Ranger 23 is heavier, displacing about 31% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Achilles 24 carries the more powerful rig (17.8 vs 17.3), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Ranger 23 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Achilles 24 rates better for offshore work (2.06 vs 2.11).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.