Alacrity 19 vs Hunter 18.5
How do the Alacrity 19 and Hunter 18.5 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Alacrity 19 | Alacrity 19 | Hunter 18.5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 18.5 ft5.64 m | 18.4 ft5.61 m |
| Waterline length | 17.0 ft5.18 m | 15.5 ft4.72 m |
| Beam | 6.9 ft2.11 m | 7.1 ft2.16 m |
| Draft | 1.8 ft0.55 m | 2.0 ft0.61 m |
| Displacement | 1,500 lb680 kg | 1,600 lb726 kg |
| Ballast | 480 lb218 kg | 520 lb236 kg |
| Sail area | 158 ft²14.7 m² | 152 ft²14.1 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 19.29 | 17.78 |
| Displacement / Length | 136 | 192 |
| Comfort ratio | 10.1 | 11.1 |
| Capsize screening | 2.42 | 2.42 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.5 | 5.3 |
Alacrity 19 vs Hunter 18.5: the short version
- The Alacrity 19 and Hunter 18.5 are close in length (18.5 ft5.64 m vs 18.4 ft5.61 m ).
- On sail area/displacement the Alacrity 19 carries the more powerful rig (19.3 vs 17.8), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Hunter 18.5 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Alacrity 19 rates better for offshore work (2.42 vs 2.42).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.