Alberg 22 vs Bristol Caravel 22
How do the Alberg 22 and Bristol Caravel 22 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Alberg 22 
Bristol Caravel 22 | Alberg 22 | Bristol Caravel 22 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 22.0 ft6.71 m | 22.0 ft6.71 m |
| Waterline length | 16.0 ft4.88 m | 19.5 ft5.94 m |
| Beam | 7.0 ft2.13 m | 7.8 ft2.36 m |
| Draft | 3.1 ft0.94 m | 3.5 ft1.07 m |
| Displacement | 3,200 lb1,451 kg | 2,850 lb1,293 kg |
| Ballast | 1,540 lb699 kg | 1,150 lb522 kg |
| Sail area | 235 ft²21.8 m² | 205 ft²19.0 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 17.31 | 16.32 |
| Displacement / Length | 349 | 172 |
| Comfort ratio | 20.8 | 14.2 |
| Capsize screening | 1.90 | 2.19 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.4 | 5.9 |
Alberg 22 vs Bristol Caravel 22: the short version
- The Alberg 22 and Bristol Caravel 22 are close in length (22.0 ft6.71 m vs 22.0 ft6.71 m ).
- The Alberg 22 is heavier, displacing about 12% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Alberg 22 carries the more powerful rig (17.3 vs 16.3), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Alberg 22 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Alberg 22 rates better for offshore work (1.90 vs 2.19).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.