Alberg 22 vs Hurley 22
How do the Alberg 22 and Hurley 22 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Alberg 22 
Hurley 22 | Alberg 22 | Hurley 22 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 22.0 ft6.71 m | 22.0 ft6.70 m |
| Waterline length | 16.0 ft4.88 m | 17.0 ft5.18 m |
| Beam | 7.0 ft2.13 m | 7.3 ft2.22 m |
| Draft | 3.1 ft0.94 m | 3.7 ft1.12 m |
| Displacement | 3,200 lb1,451 kg | 3,968 lb1,800 kg |
| Ballast | 1,540 lb699 kg | 2,425 lb1,100 kg |
| Sail area | 235 ft²21.8 m² | 296 ft²27.5 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 17.31 | 18.90 |
| Displacement / Length | 349 | 361 |
| Comfort ratio | 20.8 | 23.6 |
| Capsize screening | 1.90 | 1.84 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.4 | 5.5 |
| Average used price | — | €2,900 |
Alberg 22 vs Hurley 22: the short version
- The Alberg 22 and Hurley 22 are close in length (22.0 ft6.71 m vs 22.0 ft6.70 m ).
- The Hurley 22 is heavier, displacing about 24% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Hurley 22 carries the more powerful rig (18.9 vs 17.3), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Hurley 22 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Hurley 22 rates better for offshore work (1.84 vs 1.90).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.