Alberg 22 vs Johnson 23
How do the Alberg 22 and Johnson 23 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Alberg 22 
Johnson 23 | Alberg 22 | Johnson 23 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 22.0 ft6.71 m | 21.9 ft6.68 m |
| Waterline length | 16.0 ft4.88 m | 19.4 ft5.90 m |
| Beam | 7.0 ft2.13 m | 8.2 ft2.50 m |
| Draft | 3.1 ft0.94 m | 4.6 ft1.40 m |
| Displacement | 3,200 lb1,451 kg | 2,866 lb1,300 kg |
| Ballast | 1,540 lb699 kg | 1,411 lb640 kg |
| Sail area | 235 ft²21.8 m² | 291 ft²27.0 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 17.31 | 23.08 |
| Displacement / Length | 349 | 176 |
| Comfort ratio | 20.8 | 13.3 |
| Capsize screening | 1.90 | 2.31 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.4 | 5.9 |
| Average used price | — | €4,500 |
Alberg 22 vs Johnson 23: the short version
- The Alberg 22 and Johnson 23 are close in length (22.0 ft6.71 m vs 21.9 ft6.68 m ).
- The Alberg 22 is heavier, displacing about 12% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Johnson 23 carries the more powerful rig (23.1 vs 17.3), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Alberg 22 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Alberg 22 rates better for offshore work (1.90 vs 2.31).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.