Alberg 22 vs Sonata 6.7
How do the Alberg 22 and Sonata 6.7 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Alberg 22 
Sonata 6.7 | Alberg 22 | Sonata 6.7 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 22.0 ft6.71 m | 22.0 ft6.70 m |
| Waterline length | 16.0 ft4.88 m | 19.4 ft5.90 m |
| Beam | 7.0 ft2.13 m | 8.2 ft2.50 m |
| Draft | 3.1 ft0.94 m | 4.9 ft1.50 m |
| Displacement | 3,200 lb1,451 kg | 2,544 lb1,154 kg |
| Ballast | 1,540 lb699 kg | 952 lb432 kg |
| Sail area | 235 ft²21.8 m² | 224 ft²20.8 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 17.31 | 19.23 |
| Displacement / Length | 349 | 157 |
| Comfort ratio | 20.8 | 11.8 |
| Capsize screening | 1.90 | 2.40 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.4 | 5.9 |
Alberg 22 vs Sonata 6.7: the short version
- The Alberg 22 and Sonata 6.7 are close in length (22.0 ft6.71 m vs 22.0 ft6.70 m ).
- The Alberg 22 is heavier, displacing about 26% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Sonata 6.7 carries the more powerful rig (19.2 vs 17.3), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Alberg 22 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Alberg 22 rates better for offshore work (1.90 vs 2.40).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.