Alberg 22 vs Tempest
How do the Alberg 22 and Tempest compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Alberg 22 .svg?width=960)
Tempest | Alberg 22 | Tempest | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 22.0 ft6.71 m | 22.0 ft6.70 m |
| Waterline length | 16.0 ft4.88 m | 20.0 ft6.10 m |
| Beam | 7.0 ft2.13 m | 6.5 ft1.97 m |
| Draft | 3.1 ft0.94 m | 3.6 ft1.09 m |
| Displacement | 3,200 lb1,451 kg | 1,021 lb463 kg |
| Ballast | 1,540 lb699 kg | 440 lb200 kg |
| Sail area | 235 ft²21.8 m² | 247 ft²22.9 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 17.31 | 38.98 |
| Displacement / Length | 349 | 57 |
| Comfort ratio | 20.8 | 6.4 |
| Capsize screening | 1.90 | 2.57 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.4 | 6.0 |
Alberg 22 vs Tempest: the short version
- The Alberg 22 and Tempest are close in length (22.0 ft6.71 m vs 22.0 ft6.70 m ).
- The Alberg 22 is heavier, displacing about 213% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Tempest carries the more powerful rig (39.0 vs 17.3), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Alberg 22 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Alberg 22 rates better for offshore work (1.90 vs 2.57).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.