Alberg 29 vs Alpha 29
How do the Alberg 29 and Alpha 29 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Alberg 29 | Alberg 29 | Alpha 29 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 29.3 ft8.92 m | 29.4 ft8.95 m |
| Waterline length | 22.3 ft6.78 m | 23.6 ft7.20 m |
| Beam | 9.2 ft2.80 m | 9.3 ft2.84 m |
| Draft | 4.5 ft1.37 m | 5.4 ft1.65 m |
| Displacement | 9,000 lb4,082 kg | 7,275 lb3,300 kg |
| Ballast | 4,000 lb1,814 kg | 3,042 lb1,380 kg |
| Sail area | 417 ft²38.7 m² | 408 ft²37.9 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 15.42 | 17.39 |
| Displacement / Length | 365 | 246 |
| Comfort ratio | 29.8 | 22.7 |
| Capsize screening | 1.76 | 1.92 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.3 | 6.5 |
Alberg 29 vs Alpha 29: the short version
- The Alberg 29 and Alpha 29 are close in length (29.3 ft8.92 m vs 29.4 ft8.95 m ).
- The Alberg 29 is heavier, displacing about 24% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Alpha 29 carries the more powerful rig (17.4 vs 15.4), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Alberg 29 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Alberg 29 rates better for offshore work (1.76 vs 1.92).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.