Alberg 29 vs Catalina 28
How do the Alberg 29 and Catalina 28 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Alberg 29 
Catalina 28 | Alberg 29 | Catalina 28 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 29.3 ft8.92 m | 29.4 ft8.97 m |
| Waterline length | 22.3 ft6.78 m | 23.8 ft7.26 m |
| Beam | 9.2 ft2.80 m | 10.3 ft3.15 m |
| Draft | 4.5 ft1.37 m | 5.2 ft1.57 m |
| Displacement | 9,000 lb4,082 kg | 8,300 lb3,765 kg |
| Ballast | 4,000 lb1,814 kg | 3,200 lb1,451 kg |
| Sail area | 417 ft²38.7 m² | 369 ft²34.3 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 15.42 | 14.40 |
| Displacement / Length | 365 | 274 |
| Comfort ratio | 29.8 | 22.4 |
| Capsize screening | 1.76 | 2.04 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.3 | 6.5 |
Alberg 29 vs Catalina 28: the short version
- The Alberg 29 and Catalina 28 are close in length (29.3 ft8.92 m vs 29.4 ft8.97 m ).
- The Alberg 29 is heavier, displacing about 8% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Alberg 29 carries the more powerful rig (15.4 vs 14.4), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Alberg 29 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Alberg 29 rates better for offshore work (1.76 vs 2.04).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.