Alberg 29 vs Cornish Crabber 24
How do the Alberg 29 and Cornish Crabber 24 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Alberg 29 | Alberg 29 | Cornish Crabber 24 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 29.3 ft8.92 m | 29.3 ft8.92 m |
| Waterline length | 22.3 ft6.78 m | 20.3 ft6.17 m |
| Beam | 9.2 ft2.80 m | 8.0 ft2.44 m |
| Draft | 4.5 ft1.37 m | 4.7 ft1.42 m |
| Displacement | 9,000 lb4,082 kg | 4,600 lb2,087 kg |
| Ballast | 4,000 lb1,814 kg | 600 lb272 kg |
| Sail area | 417 ft²38.7 m² | 305 ft²28.3 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 15.42 | 17.64 |
| Displacement / Length | 365 | 247 |
| Comfort ratio | 29.8 | 19.4 |
| Capsize screening | 1.76 | 1.92 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.3 | 6.0 |
Alberg 29 vs Cornish Crabber 24: the short version
- The Alberg 29 and Cornish Crabber 24 are close in length (29.3 ft8.92 m vs 29.3 ft8.92 m ).
- The Alberg 29 is heavier, displacing about 96% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Cornish Crabber 24 carries the more powerful rig (17.6 vs 15.4), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Alberg 29 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Alberg 29 rates better for offshore work (1.76 vs 1.92).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.