Alberg 29 vs Etap 30i
How do the Alberg 29 and Etap 30i compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Alberg 29 | Alberg 29 | Etap 30i | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 29.3 ft8.92 m | 29.3 ft8.94 m |
| Waterline length | 22.3 ft6.78 m | 26.3 ft8.00 m |
| Beam | 9.2 ft2.80 m | 10.4 ft3.16 m |
| Draft | 4.5 ft1.37 m | 5.6 ft1.70 m |
| Displacement | 9,000 lb4,082 kg | 7,715 lb3,499 kg |
| Ballast | 4,000 lb1,814 kg | 2,425 lb1,100 kg |
| Sail area | 417 ft²38.7 m² | 399 ft²37.1 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 15.42 | 16.35 |
| Displacement / Length | 365 | 190 |
| Comfort ratio | 29.8 | 19.4 |
| Capsize screening | 1.76 | 2.10 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.3 | 6.9 |
Alberg 29 vs Etap 30i: the short version
- The Alberg 29 and Etap 30i are close in length (29.3 ft8.92 m vs 29.3 ft8.94 m ).
- The Alberg 29 is heavier, displacing about 17% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Etap 30i carries the more powerful rig (16.4 vs 15.4), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Alberg 29 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Alberg 29 rates better for offshore work (1.76 vs 2.10).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.