Alberg 30 vs Alberg Odyssey 30
How do the Alberg 30 and Alberg Odyssey 30 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Alberg 30 
Alberg Odyssey 30 | Alberg 30 | Alberg Odyssey 30 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 30.3 ft9.23 m | 30.3 ft9.24 m |
| Waterline length | 21.7 ft6.61 m | 21.0 ft6.40 m |
| Beam | 8.8 ft2.67 m | 8.8 ft2.67 m |
| Draft | 4.3 ft1.31 m | 4.5 ft1.37 m |
| Displacement | 9,000 lb4,082 kg | 11,000 lb4,990 kg |
| Ballast | 3,300 lb1,497 kg | 3,600 lb1,633 kg |
| Sail area | 410 ft²38.1 m² | —— |
| SA / Displacement | 15.16 | — |
| Displacement / Length | 395 | 530 |
| Comfort ratio | 31.9 | 39.7 |
| Capsize screening | 1.68 | 1.57 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.2 | 6.1 |
Alberg 30 vs Alberg Odyssey 30: the short version
- The Alberg 30 and Alberg Odyssey 30 are close in length (30.3 ft9.23 m vs 30.3 ft9.24 m ).
- The Alberg Odyssey 30 is heavier, displacing about 22% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- The Alberg Odyssey 30 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Alberg Odyssey 30 rates better for offshore work (1.57 vs 1.68).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.