Alberg 30 vs Etchells
How do the Alberg 30 and Etchells compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Alberg 30 
Etchells | Alberg 30 | Etchells | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 30.3 ft9.23 m | 30.2 ft9.20 m |
| Waterline length | 21.7 ft6.61 m | 22.0 ft6.71 m |
| Beam | 8.8 ft2.67 m | 6.9 ft2.10 m |
| Draft | 4.3 ft1.31 m | 4.5 ft1.37 m |
| Displacement | 9,000 lb4,082 kg | 3,325 lb1,508 kg |
| Ballast | 3,300 lb1,497 kg | 2,175 lb987 kg |
| Sail area | 410 ft²38.1 m² | 297 ft²27.6 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 15.16 | 21.33 |
| Displacement / Length | 395 | 139 |
| Comfort ratio | 31.9 | 16.1 |
| Capsize screening | 1.68 | 1.85 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.2 | 6.3 |
Alberg 30 vs Etchells: the short version
- The Alberg 30 and Etchells are close in length (30.3 ft9.23 m vs 30.2 ft9.20 m ).
- The Alberg 30 is heavier, displacing about 171% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Etchells carries the more powerful rig (21.3 vs 15.2), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Alberg 30 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Alberg 30 rates better for offshore work (1.68 vs 1.85).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.