Alberg 30 vs Nonsuch 30
How do the Alberg 30 and Nonsuch 30 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Alberg 30 
Nonsuch 30 | Alberg 30 | Nonsuch 30 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 30.3 ft9.23 m | 30.3 ft9.24 m |
| Waterline length | 21.7 ft6.61 m | 28.8 ft8.76 m |
| Beam | 8.8 ft2.67 m | 11.9 ft3.63 m |
| Draft | 4.3 ft1.31 m | 5.0 ft1.52 m |
| Displacement | 9,000 lb4,082 kg | 10,500 lb4,763 kg |
| Ballast | 3,300 lb1,497 kg | 4,500 lb2,041 kg |
| Sail area | 410 ft²38.1 m² | 540 ft²50.2 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 15.16 | 18.02 |
| Displacement / Length | 395 | 197 |
| Comfort ratio | 31.9 | 20.5 |
| Capsize screening | 1.68 | 2.18 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.2 | 7.2 |
Alberg 30 vs Nonsuch 30: the short version
- The Alberg 30 and Nonsuch 30 are close in length (30.3 ft9.23 m vs 30.3 ft9.24 m ).
- The Nonsuch 30 is heavier, displacing about 17% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Nonsuch 30 carries the more powerful rig (18.0 vs 15.2), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Alberg 30 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Alberg 30 rates better for offshore work (1.68 vs 2.18).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.