Alberg 30 vs Pearson 303
How do the Alberg 30 and Pearson 303 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Alberg 30 
Pearson 303 | Alberg 30 | Pearson 303 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 30.3 ft9.23 m | 30.3 ft9.23 m |
| Waterline length | 21.7 ft6.61 m | 25.4 ft7.73 m |
| Beam | 8.8 ft2.67 m | 10.9 ft3.33 m |
| Draft | 4.3 ft1.31 m | 4.3 ft1.32 m |
| Displacement | 9,000 lb4,082 kg | 10,100 lb4,581 kg |
| Ballast | 3,300 lb1,497 kg | 3,500 lb1,588 kg |
| Sail area | 410 ft²38.1 m² | 459 ft²42.6 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 15.16 | 15.72 |
| Displacement / Length | 395 | 276 |
| Comfort ratio | 31.9 | 24.1 |
| Capsize screening | 1.68 | 2.02 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.2 | 6.7 |
Alberg 30 vs Pearson 303: the short version
- The Alberg 30 and Pearson 303 are close in length (30.3 ft9.23 m vs 30.3 ft9.23 m ).
- The Pearson 303 is heavier, displacing about 12% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Pearson 303 carries the more powerful rig (15.7 vs 15.2), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Alberg 30 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Alberg 30 rates better for offshore work (1.68 vs 2.02).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.