Alberg 37 vs Baltic 37
How do the Alberg 37 and Baltic 37 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Alberg 37 
Baltic 37 | Alberg 37 | Baltic 37 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 37.2 ft11.33 m | 37.0 ft11.28 m |
| Waterline length | 26.5 ft8.08 m | 27.3 ft8.31 m |
| Beam | 10.2 ft3.10 m | 12.0 ft3.66 m |
| Draft | 5.5 ft1.68 m | 6.7 ft2.03 m |
| Displacement | 16,800 lb7,620 kg | 13,600 lb6,169 kg |
| Ballast | 6,500 lb2,948 kg | 6,120 lb2,776 kg |
| Sail area | 647 ft²60.1 m² | 640 ft²59.5 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 15.78 | 17.97 |
| Displacement / Length | 403 | 300 |
| Comfort ratio | 39.8 | 25.4 |
| Capsize screening | 1.59 | 2.01 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.9 | 7.0 |
Alberg 37 vs Baltic 37: the short version
- The Alberg 37 and Baltic 37 are close in length (37.2 ft11.33 m vs 37.0 ft11.28 m ).
- The Alberg 37 is heavier, displacing about 24% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Baltic 37 carries the more powerful rig (18.0 vs 15.8), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Alberg 37 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Alberg 37 rates better for offshore work (1.59 vs 2.01).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.