Alberg 37 vs ClubSwan 42
How do the Alberg 37 and ClubSwan 42 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Alberg 37 
ClubSwan 42 | Alberg 37 | ClubSwan 42 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 37.2 ft11.33 m | 37.0 ft11.29 m |
| Waterline length | 26.5 ft8.08 m | 37.0 ft11.29 m |
| Beam | 10.2 ft3.10 m | 12.9 ft3.93 m |
| Draft | 5.5 ft1.68 m | 8.9 ft2.70 m |
| Displacement | 16,800 lb7,620 kg | 16,865 lb7,650 kg |
| Ballast | 6,500 lb2,948 kg | 7,046 lb3,196 kg |
| Sail area | 647 ft²60.1 m² | 1,176 ft²109.3 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 15.78 | 28.61 |
| Displacement / Length | 403 | 148 |
| Comfort ratio | 39.8 | 23.4 |
| Capsize screening | 1.59 | 2.01 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.9 | 8.2 |
Alberg 37 vs ClubSwan 42: the short version
- The Alberg 37 and ClubSwan 42 are close in length (37.2 ft11.33 m vs 37.0 ft11.29 m ).
- On sail area/displacement the ClubSwan 42 carries the more powerful rig (28.6 vs 15.8), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Alberg 37 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Alberg 37 rates better for offshore work (1.59 vs 2.01).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.