Alberg 37 vs Hunter 376
How do the Alberg 37 and Hunter 376 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Alberg 37 
Hunter 376 | Alberg 37 | Hunter 376 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 37.2 ft11.33 m | 37.3 ft11.35 m |
| Waterline length | 26.5 ft8.08 m | 32.0 ft9.75 m |
| Beam | 10.2 ft3.10 m | 12.6 ft3.83 m |
| Draft | 5.5 ft1.68 m | 5.0 ft1.52 m |
| Displacement | 16,800 lb7,620 kg | 15,000 lb6,804 kg |
| Ballast | 6,500 lb2,948 kg | 5,400 lb2,449 kg |
| Sail area | 647 ft²60.1 m² | 684 ft²63.5 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 15.78 | 17.99 |
| Displacement / Length | 403 | 204 |
| Comfort ratio | 39.8 | 23.7 |
| Capsize screening | 1.59 | 2.04 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.9 | 7.6 |
Alberg 37 vs Hunter 376: the short version
- The Alberg 37 and Hunter 376 are close in length (37.2 ft11.33 m vs 37.3 ft11.35 m ).
- The Alberg 37 is heavier, displacing about 12% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Hunter 376 carries the more powerful rig (18.0 vs 15.8), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Alberg 37 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Alberg 37 rates better for offshore work (1.59 vs 2.04).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.