Alberg 37 vs Hunter 380
How do the Alberg 37 and Hunter 380 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Alberg 37 
Hunter 380 | Alberg 37 | Hunter 380 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 37.2 ft11.33 m | 37.3 ft11.35 m |
| Waterline length | 26.5 ft8.08 m | 32.0 ft9.75 m |
| Beam | 10.2 ft3.10 m | 12.6 ft3.83 m |
| Draft | 5.5 ft1.68 m | 5.0 ft1.52 m |
| Displacement | 16,800 lb7,620 kg | 16,000 lb7,257 kg |
| Ballast | 6,500 lb2,948 kg | 5,900 lb2,676 kg |
| Sail area | 647 ft²60.1 m² | 740 ft²68.7 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 15.78 | 18.65 |
| Displacement / Length | 403 | 218 |
| Comfort ratio | 39.8 | 25.3 |
| Capsize screening | 1.59 | 2.00 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.9 | 7.6 |
Alberg 37 vs Hunter 380: the short version
- The Alberg 37 and Hunter 380 are close in length (37.2 ft11.33 m vs 37.3 ft11.35 m ).
- On sail area/displacement the Hunter 380 carries the more powerful rig (18.6 vs 15.8), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Alberg 37 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Alberg 37 rates better for offshore work (1.59 vs 2.00).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.