Alberg Odyssey 30 vs C&C 30 Redwing
How do the Alberg Odyssey 30 and C&C 30 Redwing compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Alberg Odyssey 30 
C&C 30 Redwing | Alberg Odyssey 30 | C&C 30 Redwing | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 30.3 ft9.24 m | 30.3 ft9.22 m |
| Waterline length | 21.0 ft6.40 m | 21.8 ft6.63 m |
| Beam | 8.8 ft2.67 m | 8.8 ft2.67 m |
| Draft | 4.5 ft1.37 m | 4.5 ft1.37 m |
| Displacement | 11,000 lb4,990 kg | 7,650 lb3,470 kg |
| Ballast | 3,600 lb1,633 kg | 3,530 lb1,601 kg |
| Sail area | —— | 395 ft²36.7 m² |
| SA / Displacement | — | 16.28 |
| Displacement / Length | 530 | 332 |
| Comfort ratio | 39.7 | 27.1 |
| Capsize screening | 1.57 | 1.78 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.1 | 6.2 |
Alberg Odyssey 30 vs C&C 30 Redwing: the short version
- The Alberg Odyssey 30 and C&C 30 Redwing are close in length (30.3 ft9.24 m vs 30.3 ft9.22 m ).
- The Alberg Odyssey 30 is heavier, displacing about 44% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- The Alberg Odyssey 30 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Alberg Odyssey 30 rates better for offshore work (1.57 vs 1.78).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.