Alberg Odyssey 30 vs Knarr
How do the Alberg Odyssey 30 and Knarr compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Alberg Odyssey 30 
Knarr | Alberg Odyssey 30 | Knarr | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 30.3 ft9.24 m | 30.4 ft9.28 m |
| Waterline length | 21.0 ft6.40 m | 20.4 ft6.21 m |
| Beam | 8.8 ft2.67 m | 7.0 ft2.12 m |
| Draft | 4.5 ft1.37 m | 4.3 ft1.30 m |
| Displacement | 11,000 lb4,990 kg | 4,905 lb2,225 kg |
| Ballast | 3,600 lb1,633 kg | 2,822 lb1,280 kg |
| Sail area | —— | 255 ft²23.7 m² |
| SA / Displacement | — | 14.13 |
| Displacement / Length | 530 | 259 |
| Comfort ratio | 39.7 | 24.4 |
| Capsize screening | 1.57 | 1.64 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.1 | 6.0 |
Alberg Odyssey 30 vs Knarr: the short version
- The Alberg Odyssey 30 and Knarr are close in length (30.3 ft9.24 m vs 30.4 ft9.28 m ).
- The Alberg Odyssey 30 is heavier, displacing about 124% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- The Alberg Odyssey 30 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Alberg Odyssey 30 rates better for offshore work (1.57 vs 1.64).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.