Alberg Odyssey 30 vs Pearson 303
How do the Alberg Odyssey 30 and Pearson 303 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Alberg Odyssey 30 | Alberg Odyssey 30 | Pearson 303 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 30.3 ft9.24 m | 30.3 ft9.23 m |
| Waterline length | 21.0 ft6.40 m | 25.4 ft7.73 m |
| Beam | 8.8 ft2.67 m | 10.9 ft3.33 m |
| Draft | 4.5 ft1.37 m | 4.3 ft1.32 m |
| Displacement | 11,000 lb4,990 kg | 10,100 lb4,581 kg |
| Ballast | 3,600 lb1,633 kg | 3,500 lb1,588 kg |
| Sail area | —— | 459 ft²42.6 m² |
| SA / Displacement | — | 15.72 |
| Displacement / Length | 530 | 276 |
| Comfort ratio | 39.7 | 24.1 |
| Capsize screening | 1.57 | 2.02 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.1 | 6.7 |
Alberg Odyssey 30 vs Pearson 303: the short version
- The Alberg Odyssey 30 and Pearson 303 are close in length (30.3 ft9.24 m vs 30.3 ft9.23 m ).
- The Alberg Odyssey 30 is heavier, displacing about 9% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- The Alberg Odyssey 30 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Alberg Odyssey 30 rates better for offshore work (1.57 vs 2.02).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.