Alberg Odyssey 30 vs Suspens
How do the Alberg Odyssey 30 and Suspens compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Alberg Odyssey 30 | Alberg Odyssey 30 | Suspens | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 30.3 ft9.24 m | 30.4 ft9.25 m |
| Waterline length | 21.0 ft6.40 m | 25.6 ft7.80 m |
| Beam | 8.8 ft2.67 m | 9.8 ft3.00 m |
| Draft | 4.5 ft1.37 m | 5.9 ft1.80 m |
| Displacement | 11,000 lb4,990 kg | 6,118 lb2,775 kg |
| Ballast | 3,600 lb1,633 kg | 1,830 lb830 kg |
| Sail area | —— | 462 ft²42.9 m² |
| SA / Displacement | — | 22.10 |
| Displacement / Length | 530 | 163 |
| Comfort ratio | 39.7 | 16.6 |
| Capsize screening | 1.57 | 2.15 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.1 | 6.8 |
Alberg Odyssey 30 vs Suspens: the short version
- The Alberg Odyssey 30 and Suspens are close in length (30.3 ft9.24 m vs 30.4 ft9.25 m ).
- The Alberg Odyssey 30 is heavier, displacing about 80% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- The Alberg Odyssey 30 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Alberg Odyssey 30 rates better for offshore work (1.57 vs 2.15).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.