Alberg Odyssey 30 vs Swan 41
How do the Alberg Odyssey 30 and Swan 41 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Alberg Odyssey 30 | Alberg Odyssey 30 | Swan 41 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 30.3 ft9.24 m | 30.3 ft9.22 m |
| Waterline length | 21.0 ft6.40 m | 30.3 ft9.22 m |
| Beam | 8.8 ft2.67 m | 11.9 ft3.64 m |
| Draft | 4.5 ft1.37 m | 6.9 ft2.10 m |
| Displacement | 11,000 lb4,990 kg | 23,810 lb10,800 kg |
| Ballast | 3,600 lb1,633 kg | 9,700 lb4,400 kg |
| Sail area | —— | 794 ft²73.8 m² |
| SA / Displacement | — | 15.35 |
| Displacement / Length | 530 | 384 |
| Comfort ratio | 39.7 | 44.7 |
| Capsize screening | 1.57 | 1.66 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.1 | 7.4 |
Alberg Odyssey 30 vs Swan 41: the short version
- The Alberg Odyssey 30 and Swan 41 are close in length (30.3 ft9.24 m vs 30.3 ft9.22 m ).
- The Swan 41 is heavier, displacing about 116% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- The Swan 41 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Alberg Odyssey 30 rates better for offshore work (1.57 vs 1.66).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.