Albin 57 vs Albin 78 Cirrus
How do the Albin 57 and Albin 78 Cirrus compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Albin 57 
Albin 78 Cirrus | Albin 57 | Albin 78 Cirrus | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 18.8 ft5.74 m | 25.6 ft7.80 m |
| Waterline length | 16.4 ft5.00 m | 21.8 ft6.65 m |
| Beam | 7.9 ft2.41 m | 9.1 ft2.76 m |
| Draft | 4.3 ft1.30 m | 4.9 ft1.49 m |
| Displacement | 1,764 lb800 kg | 5,181 lb2,350 kg |
| Ballast | 562 lb255 kg | 2,094 lb950 kg |
| Sail area | 167 ft²15.5 m² | 281 ft²26.1 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 18.30 | 15.02 |
| Displacement / Length | 179 | 223 |
| Comfort ratio | 10.1 | 18.5 |
| Capsize screening | 2.62 | 2.09 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.4 | 6.3 |
| Average used price | €1,500 | — |
Albin 57 vs Albin 78 Cirrus: the short version
- The Albin 78 Cirrus is the larger boat at 25.6 ft7.80 m LOA versus 18.8 ft5.74 m for the Albin 57.
- The Albin 78 Cirrus is heavier, displacing about 194% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Albin 57 carries the more powerful rig (18.3 vs 15.0), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Albin 78 Cirrus scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Albin 78 Cirrus rates better for offshore work (2.09 vs 2.62).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.