Albin 57 vs Albin 79
How do the Albin 57 and Albin 79 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Albin 57 | Albin 57 | Albin 79 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 18.8 ft5.74 m | 25.9 ft7.90 m |
| Waterline length | 16.4 ft5.00 m | 20.0 ft6.10 m |
| Beam | 7.9 ft2.41 m | 8.8 ft2.67 m |
| Draft | 4.3 ft1.30 m | 4.6 ft1.40 m |
| Displacement | 1,764 lb800 kg | 4,200 lb1,905 kg |
| Ballast | 562 lb255 kg | 1,653 lb750 kg |
| Sail area | 167 ft²15.5 m² | 259 ft²24.1 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 18.30 | 15.92 |
| Displacement / Length | 179 | 234 |
| Comfort ratio | 10.1 | 16.6 |
| Capsize screening | 2.62 | 2.17 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.4 | 6.0 |
| Average used price | €1,500 | — |
Albin 57 vs Albin 79: the short version
- The Albin 79 is the larger boat at 25.9 ft7.90 m LOA versus 18.8 ft5.74 m for the Albin 57.
- The Albin 79 is heavier, displacing about 138% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Albin 57 carries the more powerful rig (18.3 vs 15.9), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Albin 79 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Albin 79 rates better for offshore work (2.17 vs 2.62).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.