Albin 57 vs Alpha 29
How do the Albin 57 and Alpha 29 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Albin 57 | Albin 57 | Alpha 29 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 18.8 ft5.74 m | 29.4 ft8.95 m |
| Waterline length | 16.4 ft5.00 m | 23.6 ft7.20 m |
| Beam | 7.9 ft2.41 m | 9.3 ft2.84 m |
| Draft | 4.3 ft1.30 m | 5.4 ft1.65 m |
| Displacement | 1,764 lb800 kg | 7,275 lb3,300 kg |
| Ballast | 562 lb255 kg | 3,042 lb1,380 kg |
| Sail area | 167 ft²15.5 m² | 408 ft²37.9 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 18.30 | 17.39 |
| Displacement / Length | 179 | 246 |
| Comfort ratio | 10.1 | 22.7 |
| Capsize screening | 2.62 | 1.92 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.4 | 6.5 |
| Average used price | €1,500 | — |
Albin 57 vs Alpha 29: the short version
- The Alpha 29 is the larger boat at 29.4 ft8.95 m LOA versus 18.8 ft5.74 m for the Albin 57.
- The Alpha 29 is heavier, displacing about 312% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Albin 57 carries the more powerful rig (18.3 vs 17.4), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Alpha 29 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Alpha 29 rates better for offshore work (1.92 vs 2.62).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.