Albin 57 vs Cumulus 28
How do the Albin 57 and Cumulus 28 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Albin 57 | Albin 57 | Cumulus 28 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 18.8 ft5.74 m | 28.1 ft8.56 m |
| Waterline length | 16.4 ft5.00 m | 22.3 ft6.81 m |
| Beam | 7.9 ft2.41 m | 9.3 ft2.82 m |
| Draft | 4.3 ft1.30 m | 5.3 ft1.60 m |
| Displacement | 1,764 lb800 kg | 7,055 lb3,200 kg |
| Ballast | 562 lb255 kg | 2,812 lb1,276 kg |
| Sail area | 167 ft²15.5 m² | 363 ft²33.7 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 18.30 | 15.79 |
| Displacement / Length | 179 | 283 |
| Comfort ratio | 10.1 | 23.4 |
| Capsize screening | 2.62 | 1.93 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.4 | 6.3 |
| Average used price | €1,500 | — |
Albin 57 vs Cumulus 28: the short version
- The Cumulus 28 is the larger boat at 28.1 ft8.56 m LOA versus 18.8 ft5.74 m for the Albin 57.
- The Cumulus 28 is heavier, displacing about 300% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Albin 57 carries the more powerful rig (18.3 vs 15.8), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Cumulus 28 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Cumulus 28 rates better for offshore work (1.93 vs 2.62).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.