Albin 57 vs Delta 31
How do the Albin 57 and Delta 31 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Albin 57 | Albin 57 | Delta 31 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 18.8 ft5.74 m | 30.7 ft9.35 m |
| Waterline length | 16.4 ft5.00 m | 24.9 ft7.60 m |
| Beam | 7.9 ft2.41 m | 10.0 ft3.04 m |
| Draft | 4.3 ft1.30 m | 5.9 ft1.80 m |
| Displacement | 1,764 lb800 kg | 8,598 lb3,900 kg |
| Ballast | 562 lb255 kg | 3,505 lb1,590 kg |
| Sail area | 167 ft²15.5 m² | 436 ft²40.5 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 18.30 | 16.62 |
| Displacement / Length | 179 | 248 |
| Comfort ratio | 10.1 | 23.3 |
| Capsize screening | 2.62 | 1.95 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.4 | 6.7 |
| Average used price | €1,500 | — |
Albin 57 vs Delta 31: the short version
- The Delta 31 is the larger boat at 30.7 ft9.35 m LOA versus 18.8 ft5.74 m for the Albin 57.
- The Delta 31 is heavier, displacing about 387% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Albin 57 carries the more powerful rig (18.3 vs 16.6), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Delta 31 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Delta 31 rates better for offshore work (1.95 vs 2.62).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.