Albin 57 vs Drascombe Lugger
How do the Albin 57 and Drascombe Lugger compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Albin 57 
Drascombe Lugger | Albin 57 | Drascombe Lugger | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 18.8 ft5.74 m | 18.8 ft5.71 m |
| Waterline length | 16.4 ft5.00 m | 14.5 ft4.42 m |
| Beam | 7.9 ft2.41 m | 6.3 ft1.91 m |
| Draft | 4.3 ft1.30 m | 4.0 ft1.22 m |
| Displacement | 1,764 lb800 kg | 600 lb272 kg |
| Ballast | 562 lb255 kg | 100 lb45 kg |
| Sail area | 167 ft²15.5 m² | 132 ft²12.3 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 18.30 | 29.69 |
| Displacement / Length | 179 | 88 |
| Comfort ratio | 10.1 | 5.1 |
| Capsize screening | 2.62 | 2.96 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.4 | 5.1 |
| Average used price | €1,500 | — |
Albin 57 vs Drascombe Lugger: the short version
- The Albin 57 and Drascombe Lugger are close in length (18.8 ft5.74 m vs 18.8 ft5.71 m ).
- The Albin 57 is heavier, displacing about 194% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Drascombe Lugger carries the more powerful rig (29.7 vs 18.3), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Albin 57 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Albin 57 rates better for offshore work (2.62 vs 2.96).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.