Albin 57 vs Nova 33
How do the Albin 57 and Nova 33 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Albin 57 
Nova 33 | Albin 57 | Nova 33 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 18.8 ft5.74 m | 33.0 ft10.06 m |
| Waterline length | 16.4 ft5.00 m | 26.3 ft8.00 m |
| Beam | 7.9 ft2.41 m | 10.3 ft3.15 m |
| Draft | 4.3 ft1.30 m | 5.5 ft1.68 m |
| Displacement | 1,764 lb800 kg | 8,177 lb3,709 kg |
| Ballast | 562 lb255 kg | 3,868 lb1,754 kg |
| Sail area | 167 ft²15.5 m² | 493 ft²45.8 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 18.30 | 19.43 |
| Displacement / Length | 179 | 202 |
| Comfort ratio | 10.1 | 19.9 |
| Capsize screening | 2.62 | 2.05 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.4 | 6.9 |
| Average used price | €1,500 | — |
Albin 57 vs Nova 33: the short version
- The Nova 33 is the larger boat at 33.0 ft10.06 m LOA versus 18.8 ft5.74 m for the Albin 57.
- The Nova 33 is heavier, displacing about 364% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Nova 33 carries the more powerful rig (19.4 vs 18.3), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Nova 33 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Nova 33 rates better for offshore work (2.05 vs 2.62).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.