Albin 57 vs Singoalla 34
How do the Albin 57 and Singoalla 34 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Albin 57 
Singoalla 34 | Albin 57 | Singoalla 34 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 18.8 ft5.74 m | 33.7 ft10.26 m |
| Waterline length | 16.4 ft5.00 m | 27.3 ft8.33 m |
| Beam | 7.9 ft2.41 m | 10.8 ft3.30 m |
| Draft | 4.3 ft1.30 m | 5.2 ft1.58 m |
| Displacement | 1,764 lb800 kg | 8,820 lb4,001 kg |
| Ballast | 562 lb255 kg | 3,750 lb1,701 kg |
| Sail area | 167 ft²15.5 m² | 433 ft²40.2 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 18.30 | 16.23 |
| Displacement / Length | 179 | 193 |
| Comfort ratio | 10.1 | 19.6 |
| Capsize screening | 2.62 | 2.09 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.4 | 7.0 |
| Average used price | €1,500 | — |
Albin 57 vs Singoalla 34: the short version
- The Singoalla 34 is the larger boat at 33.7 ft10.26 m LOA versus 18.8 ft5.74 m for the Albin 57.
- The Singoalla 34 is heavier, displacing about 400% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Albin 57 carries the more powerful rig (18.3 vs 16.2), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Singoalla 34 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Singoalla 34 rates better for offshore work (2.09 vs 2.62).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.