Albin 57 vs West Wight Potter 19
How do the Albin 57 and West Wight Potter 19 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Albin 57 
West Wight Potter 19 | Albin 57 | West Wight Potter 19 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 18.8 ft5.74 m | 18.8 ft5.71 m |
| Waterline length | 16.4 ft5.00 m | 16.8 ft5.11 m |
| Beam | 7.9 ft2.41 m | 7.5 ft2.29 m |
| Draft | 4.3 ft1.30 m | 3.6 ft1.09 m |
| Displacement | 1,764 lb800 kg | 1,225 lb556 kg |
| Ballast | 562 lb255 kg | 370 lb168 kg |
| Sail area | 167 ft²15.5 m² | 132 ft²12.3 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 18.30 | 18.45 |
| Displacement / Length | 179 | 116 |
| Comfort ratio | 10.1 | 7.4 |
| Capsize screening | 2.62 | 2.80 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.4 | 5.5 |
| Average used price | €1,500 | — |
Albin 57 vs West Wight Potter 19: the short version
- The Albin 57 and West Wight Potter 19 are close in length (18.8 ft5.74 m vs 18.8 ft5.71 m ).
- The Albin 57 is heavier, displacing about 44% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the West Wight Potter 19 carries the more powerful rig (18.4 vs 18.3), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Albin 57 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Albin 57 rates better for offshore work (2.62 vs 2.80).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.