Albin 78 Cirrus vs Albin 82 MS
How do the Albin 78 Cirrus and Albin 82 MS compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Albin 78 Cirrus 
Albin 82 MS | Albin 78 Cirrus | Albin 82 MS | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 25.6 ft7.80 m | 29.9 ft9.12 m |
| Waterline length | 21.8 ft6.65 m | 25.0 ft7.62 m |
| Beam | 9.1 ft2.76 m | 9.3 ft2.84 m |
| Draft | 4.9 ft1.49 m | 3.9 ft1.19 m |
| Displacement | 5,181 lb2,350 kg | 7,496 lb3,400 kg |
| Ballast | 2,094 lb950 kg | 1,984 lb900 kg |
| Sail area | 281 ft²26.1 m² | 323 ft²30.0 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 15.02 | 13.49 |
| Displacement / Length | 223 | 214 |
| Comfort ratio | 18.5 | 22.3 |
| Capsize screening | 2.09 | 1.91 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.3 | 6.7 |
Albin 78 Cirrus vs Albin 82 MS: the short version
- The Albin 82 MS is the larger boat at 29.9 ft9.12 m LOA versus 25.6 ft7.80 m for the Albin 78 Cirrus.
- The Albin 82 MS is heavier, displacing about 45% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Albin 78 Cirrus carries the more powerful rig (15.0 vs 13.5), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Albin 82 MS scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Albin 82 MS rates better for offshore work (1.91 vs 2.09).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.