Albin 78 Cirrus vs Alpha 29
How do the Albin 78 Cirrus and Alpha 29 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Albin 78 Cirrus 
Alpha 29 | Albin 78 Cirrus | Alpha 29 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 25.6 ft7.80 m | 29.4 ft8.95 m |
| Waterline length | 21.8 ft6.65 m | 23.6 ft7.20 m |
| Beam | 9.1 ft2.76 m | 9.3 ft2.84 m |
| Draft | 4.9 ft1.49 m | 5.4 ft1.65 m |
| Displacement | 5,181 lb2,350 kg | 7,275 lb3,300 kg |
| Ballast | 2,094 lb950 kg | 3,042 lb1,380 kg |
| Sail area | 281 ft²26.1 m² | 408 ft²37.9 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 15.02 | 17.39 |
| Displacement / Length | 223 | 246 |
| Comfort ratio | 18.5 | 22.7 |
| Capsize screening | 2.09 | 1.92 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.3 | 6.5 |
Albin 78 Cirrus vs Alpha 29: the short version
- The Alpha 29 is the larger boat at 29.4 ft8.95 m LOA versus 25.6 ft7.80 m for the Albin 78 Cirrus.
- The Alpha 29 is heavier, displacing about 40% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Alpha 29 carries the more powerful rig (17.4 vs 15.0), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Alpha 29 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Alpha 29 rates better for offshore work (1.92 vs 2.09).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.