Albin 78 Cirrus vs Contessa 26
How do the Albin 78 Cirrus and Contessa 26 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Albin 78 Cirrus 
Contessa 26 | Albin 78 Cirrus | Contessa 26 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 25.6 ft7.80 m | 25.6 ft7.80 m |
| Waterline length | 21.8 ft6.65 m | 21.0 ft6.40 m |
| Beam | 9.1 ft2.76 m | 7.5 ft2.30 m |
| Draft | 4.9 ft1.49 m | 3.9 ft1.20 m |
| Displacement | 5,181 lb2,350 kg | 5,291 lb2,400 kg |
| Ballast | 2,094 lb950 kg | 2,293 lb1,040 kg |
| Sail area | 281 ft²26.1 m² | 301 ft²28.0 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 15.02 | 15.86 |
| Displacement / Length | 223 | 255 |
| Comfort ratio | 18.5 | 24.7 |
| Capsize screening | 2.09 | 1.73 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.3 | 6.1 |
Albin 78 Cirrus vs Contessa 26: the short version
- The Albin 78 Cirrus and Contessa 26 are close in length (25.6 ft7.80 m vs 25.6 ft7.80 m ).
- On sail area/displacement the Contessa 26 carries the more powerful rig (15.9 vs 15.0), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Contessa 26 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Contessa 26 rates better for offshore work (1.73 vs 2.09).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.