Albin 78 Cirrus vs Cumulus 28
How do the Albin 78 Cirrus and Cumulus 28 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Albin 78 Cirrus 
Cumulus 28 | Albin 78 Cirrus | Cumulus 28 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 25.6 ft7.80 m | 28.1 ft8.56 m |
| Waterline length | 21.8 ft6.65 m | 22.3 ft6.81 m |
| Beam | 9.1 ft2.76 m | 9.3 ft2.82 m |
| Draft | 4.9 ft1.49 m | 5.3 ft1.60 m |
| Displacement | 5,181 lb2,350 kg | 7,055 lb3,200 kg |
| Ballast | 2,094 lb950 kg | 2,812 lb1,276 kg |
| Sail area | 281 ft²26.1 m² | 363 ft²33.7 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 15.02 | 15.79 |
| Displacement / Length | 223 | 283 |
| Comfort ratio | 18.5 | 23.4 |
| Capsize screening | 2.09 | 1.93 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.3 | 6.3 |
Albin 78 Cirrus vs Cumulus 28: the short version
- The Cumulus 28 is the larger boat at 28.1 ft8.56 m LOA versus 25.6 ft7.80 m for the Albin 78 Cirrus.
- The Cumulus 28 is heavier, displacing about 36% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Cumulus 28 carries the more powerful rig (15.8 vs 15.0), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Cumulus 28 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Cumulus 28 rates better for offshore work (1.93 vs 2.09).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.