Albin 78 Cirrus vs IW 26
How do the Albin 78 Cirrus and IW 26 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Albin 78 Cirrus 
IW 26 | Albin 78 Cirrus | IW 26 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 25.6 ft7.80 m | 25.6 ft7.80 m |
| Waterline length | 21.8 ft6.65 m | 19.5 ft5.95 m |
| Beam | 9.1 ft2.76 m | 8.4 ft2.55 m |
| Draft | 4.9 ft1.49 m | 4.6 ft1.40 m |
| Displacement | 5,181 lb2,350 kg | 4,189 lb1,900 kg |
| Ballast | 2,094 lb950 kg | 1,984 lb900 kg |
| Sail area | 281 ft²26.1 m² | 339 ft²31.5 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 15.02 | 20.87 |
| Displacement / Length | 223 | 251 |
| Comfort ratio | 18.5 | 17.9 |
| Capsize screening | 2.09 | 2.08 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.3 | 5.9 |
| Average used price | — | €4,500 |
Albin 78 Cirrus vs IW 26: the short version
- The Albin 78 Cirrus and IW 26 are close in length (25.6 ft7.80 m vs 25.6 ft7.80 m ).
- The Albin 78 Cirrus is heavier, displacing about 24% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the IW 26 carries the more powerful rig (20.9 vs 15.0), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Albin 78 Cirrus scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the IW 26 rates better for offshore work (2.08 vs 2.09).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.